YES 0.676
H-Termination proof of /home/matraf/haskell/eval_FullyBlown_Fast/Queue.hs
H-Termination of the given Haskell-Program with start terms could successfully be proven:
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
mainModule Queue
| ((queueToList :: Queue a -> [a]) :: Queue a -> [a]) |
module Queue where
| import qualified Prelude
|
| data Queue a = Q [a] [a] [a]
|
| queueToList :: Queue a -> [a]
queueToList | (Q xs ys _) | = | xs ++ reverse ys |
|
Replaced joker patterns by fresh variables and removed binding patterns.
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
mainModule Queue
| ((queueToList :: Queue a -> [a]) :: Queue a -> [a]) |
module Queue where
| import qualified Prelude
|
| data Queue a = Q [a] [a] [a]
|
| queueToList :: Queue a -> [a]
queueToList | (Q xs ys vv) | = | xs ++ reverse ys |
|
Cond Reductions:
The following Function with conditions
is transformed to
undefined0 | True | = undefined |
undefined1 | | = undefined0 False |
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
mainModule Queue
| (queueToList :: Queue a -> [a]) |
module Queue where
| import qualified Prelude
|
| data Queue a = Q [a] [a] [a]
|
| queueToList :: Queue a -> [a]
queueToList | (Q xs ys vv) | = | xs ++ reverse ys |
|
Haskell To QDPs
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ QDP
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_foldl(vy4, vy3110, vy31110, :(vy311110, vy311111), h) → new_foldl(new_flip(vy4, vy3110, h), vy31110, vy311110, vy311111, h)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_flip(vy4, vy3110, h) → :(vy3110, vy4)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_flip(x0, x1, x2)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_foldl(vy4, vy3110, vy31110, :(vy311110, vy311111), h) → new_foldl(new_flip(vy4, vy3110, h), vy31110, vy311110, vy311111, h)
The graph contains the following edges 3 >= 2, 4 > 3, 4 > 4, 5 >= 5
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_psPs(:(vy300, vy301), vy31, h) → new_psPs(vy301, vy31, h)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_psPs(:(vy300, vy301), vy31, h) → new_psPs(vy301, vy31, h)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2, 3 >= 3